] Edited by Em. Yaroslavsky.
(Moscow: Party Publishing House (Partizdat), 1933. - Marx-Engels-Lenin Institute under the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks). Protocols of congresses and conferences of the All-Union Communist Party(b). Workers of all countries, unite!)
Scan, OCR, processing, Djv, Pdf format: Sergey Mineev, 2019
- CONTENT:
From the editor (3).
PROTOCOLS OF THE CONGRESS
From the editorial committee (5).
FIRST MEETING (evening of March 18) (7-34).
Lenin's opening of the congress - Lenin's speech (7-9); elections of the presidium (9-10); secretariat (10); Credentials Commission (YU); audit commission (10-11) and editorial commission (11); adoption of regulations (11); discussion of the order of the day of the congress (11-12); Kamenev's speech on the occasion of the anniversary Paris Commune(12-13); greeting to the Red Army (13); Radek's greeting (13); election of honorary members of the presidium (14); discussion of the first item on the order of the day - report of the Central Committee - report of Lenin (14-28); debate on the report of the Central Committee - speeches by Alexandrov (28); Osinsky (29-31); Vareikis (31); Lomova (31-32); Krylova (32); discussion of the resolution on the Central Committee report (33-34); adoption of resolution (34); making a decision to organize three sections at the congress (34).
SECOND MEETING (morning of March 19) (35-76).
Lozovsky's welcoming speech on behalf of the Social Democratic Internationalists (35-36); discussion of the second item on the order of the day - the party program (36-76); Bukharin's report (36-49); Lenin's report (50-66); acceptance of the “Address” (67); debate on program reports (67-76); Podbelsky's speech (67-69); Lomova (69-70); Ryazanov (70-03); Krasikova (73-74); Krylenko (74-76).
MEETING THREE (evening of March 19) (77-118).
Albert's welcoming speech on behalf of the foreign delegates of the First Congress of the Comintern (77); continuation of debate on the program (77-118); Yurenev's speech (77-79); Pyatakov (79-83); Tomsky (83-86); Sunitsa (86-89); Herman (89-91); Osinsky (91-96); Rykova (96-100); final, Lenin's word (101-109); Bukharin (109-116); adoption of a resolution on the draft program (116-117); elections of the program commission (117-118).
SESSION FOUR (morning of March 20) (119-161).
Discussion of the third item on the order of the day - attitude towards the Communist International (119-145); Zinoviev's report (119-141); debate on the issue of the Comintern (141-145); Torchinsky's speech (141-142); Milutina (143); final word Zinoviev (143-145); adoption of resolution (145); discussion of point 4 of the order of the day - martial law (145-160); Sokolnikov's report (146-155); co-report by V. Smirnov (155-160); Sapronov's proposal (161).
FIRST MEETING OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL SECTION (evening of March 20) (162-188).
Zinoviev's report (162-164); co-report by Osinsky (165-169); Nogin's speeches (169-171); Sapronova (171-173); Sosnovsky (173-176); Skrypnik (176-177); Avanesova (177-179); Kaganovich (179-181); Muranova (181); Ignatiev (182-183); Osinsky's final words (184-185); Zinoviev (185-187); adoption of resolution (187); commission elections (188).
SECOND MEETING OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL SECTION (morning of March 21) (89-227).
Osinsky's report (189-199); Ignatov's speeches (199-201); Antonov (201-203); Sapronova (903-203); Volina (205-207); Avanesova (207-211); Minkova (211-213); Mgeladze (213-215); Kaganovich (215-217); Latsis (217-218); Osinsky's final words (218-220); Zinoviev (220-226); adoption of resolution (227).
FIRST MEETING OF THE AGRARIAN SECTION (evening of March 20) (228-250).
Kuraev's report on land policy (228-243); debate on the issue of land policy - speeches by Gorshkov (243-244); Lishaeva (244-245); Milyutin (245-248); Pakhomov (248-249).
SECOND MEETING OF THE AGRICULTURAL SECTION (morning of March 21) (251-259).
Opening a private meeting (251); Kostelovskaya's report on work in the village (251-255); opening of the meeting of the agricultural section (256); debate on Kuraev's report on land policy - Ivanov's speeches (256-257); Polyanina (257-258); Milyukova (258-259).
THIRD MEETING OF THE AGRARIAN SECTION (evening of March 22) (260-272).
Continuation of the debate on reports on land policy and work in the countryside (260-272); speech by the chairman (Lunacharsky) with a proposal on the procedure for further work (260); speeches by Kuraev (260) Philip (261); Milyutin (261-262); Sudika (263); Pavlova (263); Panfilova (263-264); Savelyeva (264); Kvasnikova (264-265); Pakhomova (265); Ivanova (265-266); Sergusheva (266); Mitrofanova (266-270); Lunacharsky (270); Ivanova (270-271); Milutina (271); Lunacharsky (271); Mitrofanova (271); Nemtseva (271); Minin (272); Palitkova (272); commission elections (272); closing section (272). Report from the editorial commission on the minutes of the meeting of the military section and the closed plenary meeting of the congress (272).
SESSION SIX (morning of March 22) (273-301).
Election of a commission to develop a resolution on a military issue (273); report of the credentials commission - report of Stasova (273-274); debate on the report - speeches by Minkov (274); Vetoshkina (275); final words (276); approval of the report of the Credentials Committee (277); discussion of organizational issues (277-301); Zinoviev's report (277-294); additional reports: Sosnovsky - on the press (94-295); Kollontai - about work among women (295-300); Shatskina - about work among young people (300-301).
SESSION SEVEN (evening of March 22) (302-336).
Continued discussion of the organizational issue (302-324); co-report by Osinsky (302-313); drinking by organizational issue- Sapronov’s speeches (313-315); Lunacharsky (316-318); Osinsky's closing remarks (318-321); Zinoviev’s announcement of a radio telegram on the proclamation of a Soviet Republic in Hungary (321); Rudnyansky's speech (321-322); instructions to Lenin to send a greeting by radio to the government of Soviet Hungary (322); continuation of the discussion of the organizational issue - Zinoviev’s final word (322-324); adoption of a core resolution and three additional resolutions (324); report of the audit commission (325); approval of the report (323); discussion of the report of the program commission (326-335); Kamenev's report (326-335); announcement by the chairman of additional information about the events in Budapest (333); continuation of the discussion of the report of the program commission - Pyatakov’s speech with the announcement of the amendment (335-336); voting (336); adoption of the party program (336).
SESSION EIGHTH (evening of March 23) (337-364).
Discussion of the report of the commission on the issue of military policy (337-338); Yaroslavsky's report (337-338); adoption of resolution (338); discussion of the issue of the procedure for elections of the Central Committee (338-339); discussion of the report on work in the village (339-361); Lenin's report (339-353); speeches by Lunacharsky (353); Pakhomov (353-356; Lenin (357); Lunacharsky (357); extraordinary statement by Sadoul with respect to the memory of the executed Jeanne Labourbe (357-358); continuation of the debate on work in the village - Panfilov’s speech (358-361); adoption of a resolution (361 ); elections of the Central Committee (361); Lenin's speech at the closing of the congress (361-364); closing of the congress (364).
CONGRESS MATERIALS (365-429).
I. Resolutions and resolutions (365-425).
1. According to the report of the Central Committee (365).
2. About the draft program (365).
3. Program of the RCP (b) (379).
4. About the Communist International (401).
5. On a military issue. (401-411).
A. General provisions (401).
B. Practical measures (410).
6. On the organizational issue (411-417).
A. Party building (411-415).
1. Party growth (411).
2. Connection with the masses (412).
3. Central Committee and local organizations (412).
4. Internal structure Central Committee (413).
5. National organizations (413).
6. Existence of special organizations (414).
7. Centralism and discipline (414).
8. Distribution of party forces (414).
9. Training of party workers (414).
10. “News of the Central Committee” (414).
11. Party charter (415).
B. Soviet construction (415-416).
1. Composition of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee (415).
2. Presidium of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee (415).
3. Councils and executive committees (415).
4. Involvement of all workers in the councils (415).
5. Socialist control (415).
B. Relations between the party and the councils (416-417).
7. On the attitude towards the middle peasantry (417).
8. About political propaganda and cultural and educational work in the village (420).
9. About work among the female proletariat (423).
10. About work among young people (423).
11. About the party and Soviet press (424).
12. About the Central Committee (425).
13. About the audit commission (425).
II. Greetings of the VIII Congress of the RCP(b) (426-427).
1. To the Communist International (426).
2. Red Army (426).
3. To the Government of the Hungarian Soviet Republic (426).
4. Comrade Lorio (426).
5. To Comrade Radek (427).
III. Address of the VIII Congress of the RCP(b) to party organizations (428).
IV. Rules of the Congress (429).
APPLICATIONS (430-471).
I. Reports of the Central Committee of the RCP (b) (430-447).
A. Organizational report of the Central Committee (430-445).
1. Organizational work (430).
2. Activities of the secretariat (430-433).
a) Reports, reports, correspondence (430).
b) Reception of delegates (432).
c) Questionnaires (433).
3. Publishing activities (433).
4. Report of the Central Bureau of Muslim Organizations of the RCP (Bolsheviks) (433).
5. Report on the activities of the Federation of Foreign Groups (434-439).
a) General report (434).
b) Report of the German Group (436).
c) Report of the Hungarian Group (437).
d) Report of the Central Committee of the Czech-Slovak Group (438).
e) Yuzhno Report Slavic group (438).
6. Communication with organizations (439).
B. Cash report of the Central Committee of the RCP (b) (448-449).
II. Appeal from the Secretariat of the Central Committee of the RCP(b) (448).
III. Composition of the congress, its sections and commissions (449-465).
1. Voting delegates (449).
2. Delegates with advisory vote (459).
3. Organizational section (463).
4. Military section (464).
5. Agrarian section (464).
6. Presidium (465).
7. Secretariat (465).
8. Program Commission (465).
9. Organizing commission (465).
10. Military commission (465).
11. Agrarian Commission (465).
12. Audit Commission (465).
13. Credentials Committee (465).
14. Editorial committee (465).
IV. Questionnaire about the personnel of the congress (466-470).
V. Factual amendment (471).
NOTES (472-517).
INDEXES (519-557).
Dictionary-index of names (519).
Subject index (548).
ILLUSTRATION
Book cover: “VIII Congress of the Russian Communist Party (Bolsheviks)” - 1919 (3).
From the editor: The Eighth Party Congress has an outstanding place in the history of our party. At this congress, the party program that is still in force was adopted. Associated with this congress is a resolution on a strong alliance with the middle peasantry and other decisions that have worldwide historical meaning...
RSDLP RSDLP(b) RCP(b) All-Union Communist Party (b) CPSU History of the party October Revolution War communism New economic policy Lenin's call Stalinism Khrushchev's thaw Period of stagnation Perestroika Party organization Politburo ... ... Wikipedia
The Twentieth Congress of the CPSU was held in Moscow on February 14–25, 1956. It is best known for condemning the cult of personality and, indirectly, the ideological legacy of Stalin. Contents 1 General information... Wikipedia
- (28) XXVIII Congress of the CPSU. (July 1990) ... Wikipedia
Badge issued for the XXII Congress of the CPSU The XXII Congress of the CPSU took place on the 17th... Wikipedia
XIX Congress of the Communist Party Soviet Union was held in Moscow from October 5 to October 14, 1952. The first Congress after 1939. The size of the party by this time was about 6 million members and about 900 thousand candidates. On... ... Wikipedia
Postage stamp issued for the XXIII Congress of the CPSU XXIII Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Held in Moscow from March 29 to April 8, 1966 At the Congress pr... Wikipedia
Postage stamp issued for the XXIV Congress of the CPSU The XXIV Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union was held in Moscow from March 30 to April 9 ... Wikipedia
Main article: Communist Party of the Soviet Union The 26th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union was held in Moscow from February 23 to March 3, 1981. 4994 delegates attended the congress... Wikipedia
The 25th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union was held in Moscow from February 24 to March 5, 1976. 4998 delegates attended the congress. Contents 1 Order of the day 2 Decisions of the Congress ... Wikipedia
Books
- Improving management. From experiments to widespread practice, A. I. Milyukov. The XXVII Congress of the CPSU set the task of implementing a radical reform of the management system. In the twelfth five-year plan it is necessary to transfer all sectors of the economy to new management methods, brochure...
- Political report of the Central Committee of the CPSU to the XXVII Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, M. S. Gorbachev. The XXVII Congress of the CPSU met at a sharp turning point in the life of the country, modern world generally. We begin our work with a sense of deep understanding of our responsibility to the party and the Soviet...
July 2 marks 20 years since the XXVIII Congress of the CPSU began its work. This was the last one in the history of the party.
Due to internal disagreements, the Congress was unable to adopt a new program, limiting itself to a policy statement. However, in his final speech at the closing of the congress, Gorbachev once again emphasized that the party “must decisively and without delay restructure all its work and all structures on the basis of the new charter and program statement of the congress in order to effectively fulfill its role in the new conditions avant-garde parties."
The XXVIII Congress, after a heated discussion, approved the party “platform”, which actually canceled the 1986 program and declared the gradual transition of the CPSU to the position of “democratic socialism”.
IN new charter paragraph 22 was included, which, despite weak reservations, practically legitimized the federalization of the party, proclaiming the independence of republican party organizations and giving them the right to develop their own programmatic and regulations, that is, to have own programs and statutes. The adoption of this paragraph meant the liquidation of the CPSU as a single political party and at the same time eliminated the last weak barriers to the division of the USSR.
The new charter established the election of the General Secretary of the Central Committee at the congress. The position of Deputy General Secretary, elected at the congress, was also established.
The plenum of the CPSU Central Committee, held at the end of the XXVIII Congress (July 13-14, 1990), elected the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee, for the first time without candidate members. There was a complete renewal of the Politburo, with the exception of the General Secretary. For the first time in history, the Politburo did not include the leaders of the government and the main political departments.
Thus ended the 28th Party Congress, which turned out to be the last in the history of the party. Several opposing currents took shape within the CPSU. And soon the creation of new parties of social democratic and liberal orientation began.
The confrontation between reformist and conservative forces led to an aggravation of crisis phenomena in the party and society. In June 1991, at the plenum of the CPSU Central Committee, Mikhail Gorbachev was subjected to sharp criticism, in response to which he announced that he was resigning from the post of General Secretary. The resignation was rejected, as it threatened the collapse of the CPSU itself.
On August 29, 1991, the Supreme Soviet of the USSR suspended the activities of the CPSU throughout the USSR. A complete ban on the activities of the CPSU and the Communist Party of the RSFSR was carried out by decree of the President of the RSFSR Boris Yeltsin on November 6, 1991.
In 1992 and subsequent years, a number of communist parties and organizations were created in Russia, the largest of which is the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.
The material was prepared based on information from open sources
The XXVII Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union is the first congress after the deaths of Brezhnev, Yu. V. Andropov and K. U. Chernenko ( general secretary The Central Committee of the party was already M. S. Gorbachev) and the penultimate one in the history of the CPSU. Held in Moscow from February 25 to March 6, 1986. At the congress, the years of Brezhnev's leadership were called a period of stagnation.
I look at three old friends from childhood:
And for some reason three other names pop up: Kurginyan, Spesivtsev, Shatrov. And I remember Kurginyan’s performance, which has already become business card on all TV channels - “the beloved child of the 27th Congress of the CPSU.” This is exactly what the writer Shatrov called Kurginyan. He probably didn’t call it in vain; he knew what he was talking about. True, Kurginyan Lately winces a lot when this is mentioned. So who is Shatrov, who was able to so enthusiastically evaluate the future star of intrigue back in 1986?
Well, first of all, Shatrov is not Shatrov at all, but Marshak. Comes from childhood. Remember Samuil Yakovlevich Marshak, this is his relative. Mikhail Filippovich Marshak.
Dad is engineer Philip Semyonovich Marshak. Shot in 1938.
Mother - Cecilia Aleksandrovna Marshak. Arrested in 1949, amnestied in 1954. Apparently, in the EAK case.
Mikhail Shatrov’s aunt, Nina Semyonovna Marshak, was married to the leader of the Comintern, Osip Pyatnitsky, in her first marriage.
second marriage - to the Soviet statesman A.I. Rykov.
Osip Aronovich Pyatnitsky
(also Joseph Orionovich, real name Tarshis)
Arrested on July 27, 1937. On July 28, 1938, he was sentenced to capital punishment by the Military Collegium of the Supreme Court of the USSR. Shot on July 29, 1938. Posthumously rehabilitated in January 1956.
Wife - Yulia Iosifovna Sokolova-Pyatnitskaya - repressed in 1938, died in a camp, rehabilitated in 1956.
The son, Vladimir Iosifovich Pyatnitsky, is the head of the St. Petersburg Memorial Society.
Rykov, Alexey Ivanovich
people's commissar Internal Affairs of the RSFSR (1917), Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR (1924-1930) and at the same time the Council of People's Commissars of the RSFSR (1924-1929)
At a plenum in February 1937, he was expelled from the party and arrested on February 27, 1937. He was held in Lubyanka prison. During interrogations he pleaded guilty. As one of the main accused, he was brought to the open trial (Third Moscow Trial) in the case of the Right-Trotskyist Anti-Soviet Bloc. IN last word stated: “I want those who have not yet been exposed and disarmed to do so immediately and openly... to help the government expose and eliminate the remnants of the rump of the counter-revolutionary organization.” On March 13, 1938 he was sentenced to death and on March 15 he was executed at the Kommunarsky training ground. In 1957, an application was submitted for the rehabilitation of Rykov, but it was rejected. Rykov was completely rehabilitated by the Main Military Prosecutor's Office of the USSR in 1988. In the same year he was reinstated in the CPSU.
Daughter - Natalya Alekseevna Perli-Rykova (born August 22, 1916), was convicted by the OSO in 1939, 1946 and 1950. She spent 18 years in camps. Rehabilitated in 1956
So you can imagine what it was like for Shatrov-Marshak. Nevertheless, he had a brilliant career.
He graduated from school with a silver medal and entered the Mining Institute (he studied in the same course with the future vice-mayor of Moscow Vladimir Resin). In the early 1950s, he completed an internship in Altai, where he worked as a driller, and there he began to write. In 1954, the first play, “Clean Hands,” was written. Laureate of the USSR State Prize ( 1983
), holder of the Order of the Red Banner of Labor ( 1982
) and the Order of Friendship of Peoples ( 1984
).
His plays are staged in theaters. But it seems that the biography of relatives makes itself felt.
About him political views, we can judge from the following biographical facts:
In 1990, he became one of the co-chairs of the April organization.
"April" - All-Union Association of Writers in Support of Perestroika. An organization that united Soviet writers, literary critics, publicists and journalists speaking in support of the political and economic reforms of M. S. Gorbachev. The name of the organization is a reference to the April plenum of the CPSU Central Committee in 1985, at which the course for Perestroika was announced.
Members of the organization actively wrote journalistic articles in literary and socio-political magazines of a democratic nature, in particular such as Ogonyok, Znamya, Neva, Yunost, etc.
Since 1989, the April Writers Association, together with Soviet-British The publishing house "Inter-Verso" published the literary, artistic and socio-political almanac "April". It published Fazil Iskander, Bulat Okudzhava, Andrei Sakharov, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Andrei Voznesensky, Anatoly Pristavkin, Evgeny Evtushenko, Yunna Moritz, Evgenia Yasina, Lidiya Chukovskaya, Lyudmila Petrushevskaya, Daniil Granin, Lev Razgon, Tatyana Bek, Boris Chichibabin, Alla Gerber , Galina Drobot, Grigory Pomerantz and many other famous writers and public figures.
Then, unexpectedly, in the mid-1990s, Shatrov turned out to be the president and chairman of the board of directors of JSC Moscow - Krasnye Holmy, which manages the Russian cultural and business center "Red Hills", opened in 2003, which, in particular, includes the Swissotel Krasnye Holmy (34 -storey hotel in the center of Moscow, located on an island between the Moskva River and the Vodootvodny Canal. The hotel is one of the tallest buildings in Moscow. Belongs to the Swiss group "Swissôtel Hotels & Resorts", which has 28 high-class hotels located in largest cities peace. The hotel opened in July 2005.). According to Shatrov himself, he had nothing to do with the financial and economic activity, but was only engaged in creative work. Just like Kurginyan.
On December 9, 2000, he joined the public council of Gorbachev’s Russian United Social Democratic Party.
By the way, the second wife is actress Irina Miroshnichenko. He was married for the fourth time to Elena Gorbunova, who soon after her divorce from Shatrov became the wife of Boris Berezovsky.
They even have transient wives.
Well, in order for you to understand what role Shatrov played during the years of Perestroika, I will quote Nina Andreeva from her famous letter:
I can't compromise my principles
I was probably not the only one who noticed that the calls of the party leaders to turn the attention of the “whistleblowers” also to the facts of real achievements at different stages of socialist construction, as if on command, cause more and more outbreaks of “revelations.” A noticeable phenomenon in this, alas, barren field are the plays of M. Shatrov. On the opening day of the XXVI Party Congress (1981), I had the opportunity to attend the play “Blue Horses on Red Grass.” I remember the excited reaction of young people in the episode when Lenin’s secretary tries to pour water on his head from a kettle, confusing it with an unfinished clay sculpture model. By the way, some of the young people came with pre-prepared banners, the meaning of which boils down to mixing our past and present with dirt... In the "Brest Peace" Lenin, at the behest of the playwright and director, kneels before Trotsky. A sort of symbolic embodiment of the author's concept. Further development she gets in the play "Further... further... further!" Of course, the play is not a historical treatise. But even in work of art the truth is ensured by nothing other than the position of the author. Especially if we're talking about about political theater.
The position of the playwright Shatrov was analyzed in detail and with reason in reviews of academic historians published in the newspapers "Pravda" and " Soviet Russia". I would like to express my opinion. In particular, one cannot but agree that Shatrov significantly departs from the accepted principles of socialist realism. Covering the most crucial period in the history of our country, he absolutizes subjective factor social development, clearly ignores the objective laws of history, manifested in the activities of classes and masses. The role of the proletarian masses, the Bolshevik Party, is reduced here to the “backdrop” against which the actions of irresponsible politicians unfold.
Reviewers, relying on the Marxist-Leninist methodology for studying specific historical processes, convincingly showed that Shatrov distorts the history of socialism in our country. The subject of rejection is the state of the dictatorship of the proletariat, without whose historical contribution we would have nothing to rebuild today. Further, the author accuses Stalin of the murders of Trotsky and Kirov, of “blocking” the sick Lenin. But is it really conceivable to throw tendentious accusations at historical figures without bothering with evidence...
Unfortunately, the reviewers failed to show that, despite all his authorial claims, the playwright is not original. It seemed to me that, according to the logic of assessments and arguments, it is very close to the motives of the book by B. Suvarich, published in 1935 in Paris. In the play, Shatrov put into the mouths of the characters what was asserted by the opponents of Leninism regarding the course of the revolution, Lenin’s role in it, the relationships of members of the Central Committee at various stages of the internal party struggle... This is the essence of Shatrov’s “new reading” of Lenin. I will add that the author of “Children of the Arbat” A. Rybakov openly admitted that he borrowed certain stories from emigrant publications.
Shortly after the February Plenum, Pravda published a letter “In a new circle?”, signed by eight of our leading theater figures. They warn against possible, in their opinion, delays in the production of M. Shatrov's latest play. This conclusion is drawn from critical assessments of the play that appeared in newspapers. For some reason, the authors of the letter exclude the authors of critical reviews from those “who hold the Fatherland dear.” How does this fit in with their desire to “violently and passionately” discuss the problems of our ancient and recent history? It turns out that only they are allowed to have their own opinion?
In short, Shatrov is a consistent supporter of Gorbachev. He was and did not renounce his convictions until his death. So he enthusiastically called Kurginyan “the beloved child of the 27th Congress of the CPSU.”
P.S.
I hope that you will also appreciate the discussion that unfolded through these links - delivered by:
http://roman-romets.livejournal.com/102114.html
http://roman-romets.livejournal.com/102595.html
It seems that friends from childhood urgently need to sell real estate on Rublyovka, before the cognitive scientists themselves tell about it.
September 27, 2018 In Moscow, PREQVECA and Cbonds Congress will hold the traditional annual professional conference “Russian RE Congress”. The expected number of participants is 110-120 people.
Five reasons why you need to attend our conference:
The first reason is the most important: all the leading and active players in the market gather here (and you, too, consider yourself one of those!).
Currently, representatives of more than 15 PE&VC funds, more than 7 corporations and entrepreneurs, 9 law firms, five consulting and service companies, four investment companies and banks, about 10 structures representing market infrastructure, media and other areas have already registered for the conference. Overall, on this moment more than 60 delegates registered for the congress.
The second reason is no less important: interesting and strong program sessions.
Traditionally, the Russian RE Congress offers its participants an interesting professional program. The conference program, which this year we called “Private Equity: Harnessing the Wind of Change,” is aimed at ensuring that conference participants are constantly aware of the main events and trends in the local industry.
This year we brought up the following issues and topics for discussion:
§ Private Equity in Russia and the CIS: where we are now
§ Distress Assets: identifying opportunities and realizing value
§ Private Equity market against the backdrop of the introduction of new sanctions: legal aspects of doing business in the new realities
§ Public-private partnership and infrastructure development
§ Public-private partnership in the technology sector
§ Entrepreneurs: life with a foundation first hand
and others.
Limited performance opportunities remain. If you have ideas and suggestions, we will be happy to discuss them.
Reason three: refresh current and make new professional contacts, keep abreast of the latest trends in the market.
This year the Russian RE Congress celebrates its tenth anniversary. Today, the Russian RE Congress is the only professional conference for specialists in the financial and investment industry in the RE market of Russia and the CIS. Over the years, the conference has become not just a conference, but a little more - a professional community and club.
previous conference .
Reason four: Russia Private Equity Awards is an annual award ceremony for achievements in the PE market.
The awards will take place in the following categories:
Best PE Team
Best International Law Firm
Best Russian Law Firm
Best International Consultant
The best Russian consultant.
Deal of the year
Link to the official websiteprevious awards ceremonies .
Reason five: Your business is preparing to move to a new level - do it with private equity industry professionals.
In the current economic situation, it is very difficult for Russian businesses to attract money for development. With external capital markets closed and internal ones depressed, private equity investors are virtually the only class of investors left with a focus on medium and small businesses.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:
General partners of the Congress: Salomons Partners and RUSNANO.
Official partners Congress: Debevoise & Plimpton, Squire Patton Boggs, O2Consulting and Blaze Consulting.
Sponsor of the Russia PE Awards Ceremony: Support Partners.
Legal partners: DENTONS, Baker & McKenzie, DS Law and Norland Legal.
Tech session partner: DLA Piper.
With the support of professional associations: RUSPEC and NAURAN.
Media partners: Cbonds Review, Financial One, RVC and GoTech.
For speaking, nomination and sponsorship inquiries, please contact
