Unified Knowledge System. (Yuri Rybnikov). Yu.S. Rybnikov. Rybnikov lectures on pseudoscience and pseudo-patriots

THEORY OF THE UNITY OF ELECTRICITY, ELECTROATOM, ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD RYBNIKOV 09/28/2013

Discovery of the All Kind - the Primary Particle of Matter!

Rybnikov Yuri Stepanovich

Scientific researcher, invented, developed and introduced powder polymer painting technology in the USSR, teaches at the Moscow State University technical university Radio Engineering of Electronics and Automation (MSTU MIREA), Moscow, Russia. author of the theory of "Unified Electric Field."

SOME FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEMS OF MATHEMATICS, PHYSICS, CHEMISTRY.

Many of us wondered why at school we memorized (crammed) the multiplication table without checking its correctness, and did not find the answer. For most students, this question did not arise; we were taught to live by “faith” from the cradle, and this is what it led to. 2×3=6, or 2×3=2+2+2=6, although in the mathematical reference book and in the Soviet encyclopedic dictionary the multiplication action is written as A×B = (A×A×A×…×A) B times. Logically and according to the rules of mathematics, one should write 2×3=2×2×2=8. It’s hard to believe, but the mathematics “teachers” could not answer why there is a double interpretation and different results of the action 2x3=….?

The second example is 2×0 = 0, and multiply two planes by zero = 2 itself. ?, and multiply two planes by three (3) to get eight (8) planes or in the form of numbers 2sam. × 3=8self. It’s scary to think that it is mathematicians who, instead of convincing calculations and proofs, operate with dogmas 2 × 3 = 6 - this is the truth!

Convincing and convincing answers to this and other problems of mathematics have to be given to people who have free thinking, capable of checking calculations according to the established rules of mathematics and sound logic of thinking, spelling, composing and pronouncing definitions.

First, let’s separate numerical (numerical) mathematics, where only numbers are counted, from subject mathematics, where actions are performed with objects, i.e. counting objects (counting RUS). Secondly, in current mathematics for some reason we start counting from one, and not from zero(?), and the “multiplication” table by school notebooks We start counting from 2, not from one, and do not show multiplication by zero and one. Thirdly, in nature there is nothing fractional, but only whole natural units. Fourthly, in nature there is nothing negative and positive, but there are real objects and numbers written accordingly, while positive and/or negative are conventions and/or the opinion of individuals or a group of individuals.

Fifthly, the signs plus “+”, minus “–”, multiply “×”, divide “:” cannot belong to any number and/or object, since they are symbols of actions with objects and numbers. Sixth, every word must have a logical and functional continuation, i.e. action, for example: sum - sums up; multiplication - multiplies; blacksmith - forges; the reaper reaps, the accountant counts, the liar lies, the priest eats, etc. Seventhly, on what basis is the mathematical action of summation, where the result is the sum - Σ, REDEFINITED to the words “addition and addition”, which are also denoted by the sign “+”, which belongs to the word SUM – Σ. So in the reference book on page 224 they replace logic with falsehood: “adding” identical terms is called “multiplication”!? In the same place - “the sum Σ – 2+2+2+2 can be written differently by the expression 2×4; such a record is called PRODUCT.” In mathematics, the sign (symbol) “×” refers to the action of multiplication and has never been used in the action of summation. On page 225 - “the number that is “added” (another redefinition of the word summation to the word “add”, which is absent in the mathematical apparatus), the first one is called the first factor”, and in the rules of summation p. 191 “the numbers themselves are called addends” and "+" sign. It is impossible to call these targeted redefinitions an error; it turns out that the summation action depends on what numbers (digits) we are summing, if the summation of different numbers (digits) is a sum, and the summation identical numbers(digits) this is not a sum! In the mathematics of objects, the summation of identical objects takes place, but when trying to sum various items, the summation action is not valid,

That is, it is necessary to redefine objects with the same name, for example: 2 birches + 1 fir tree + 3 oaks must be redefined into the word “tree” and only then we get the sum 2d + 1d + 3d = 6d

The action Multiplication is indicated by the sign “×”, the number that is multiplied is called the multiplicand, the number that shows how many times the multiplicand must be multiplied by itself is called the multiplier, i.e. 2 – multiplicand ×3 – factor = 8 product, otherwise 2×2×2=8 =23.

In the reference book on page 225, “The number that is “added” is called the first factor??, but the numbers (digits) that are “added” i.e. summation is considered in the summation section p. 190, and not in the multiplication section. The number that shows how many equal terms “add” is called the second “factor”??. Example 3-first factor × 6-second factor = the value of the product, while showing the example of the action of summation - 3 × 6 “product” = 3+3+3+3+3+3 (obvious summation) = 18. at the same time they add that instead of “the meaning of the work” they often say “work”. Surprisingly, the summation of six “three rubles” 3+3+3+3+3+3 (obvious summation of identical numbers) = 18 result (sum) is called a “product”!

The product is the result of multiplying n factors A×A×A...×A =P.

Section – multiplying a number by one and zero:

“The product 7×1 means that the number 7 is ‘added’ once, which means 7×1=7.” Why “take the number 7 as a term” if it is not summed, but multiplied. “As you can see, the value of the product is equal to the number that is multiplied by one” “The product of 1×7 is equal to 1+1+1+1+1+1+1, i.e. 1×7=7”, the obvious sum 1+1+1+1+1+1+1=7 is presented as a product! The product is the result of multiplying n factors A×A×A...×A =P.

While the product of one seven times - 1x7 is equal to 1, the Product is the result of multiplying n factors A×A×A...×A =P. using the example: 1×1×1×1×1×1×1=1×7=17=1. – read the definition of the action degree “A degree, the product of several equal factors (for example 24= 2×2×2×2=16). Who needs an obvious substitution of mathematical operations at the initial stage of education?

Directory Section - multiplying a number by zero

“The product of 6x0 means that the number 6 never “adds”, so the result of such a product will be 0.” 6×0=0. “The product 0x6 means 0+0+0+0+0+0.” The value of this “sum” is zero, so 0×6=0” The product is presented as “added,” but there is no such action in mathematics. 0+0+0+0+0+0 – the obvious sum is presented as a “product” that “adds up”. Further 0 – the number and its meaning and functions are not defined; someone removed 0 to 10th place, so the statements and examples are unproven!

In the RUS counting, the starting point of the count is the number (digit) 0-zero, from which the counting and selection of a new unit begin. When multiplied by zero and raised to the zero power, it automatically leads US to a new unit (1) of counting, i.e. transition to a new account unit.

As an example, they allegedly give the “PYTHAGORAN MULTIPLICATION TABLE”; in reality, it presents a TABLE OF SUMMATION OF IDENTICAL NUMBERS and there is not even a hint of multiplication there. When checking, everyone who is able to check with a mathematical operation - SUMMATION - will be convinced of this. In addition, it is known that “Pythagorean pants are equal in all directions,” that is, the sum of the squares of the legs is equal to the square of the hypotenuse. Pythagoras considered multiplication and exponentiation A2+B2=C2 or A×A+B×B=C×C - someone replaced knowledge with a lie.

Section – “displacement”!! property of "multiplication"?

“6×7=42 and 7×6=42 – 6+6+6+6+6+6+6=7+7+7+7+7+7”

6+6+6+6+6+6+6=42 is the sum of seven sixes, i.e. SUMMATION of identical numbers, but where is multiplication as an action?

7+7+7+7+7+7=42 is the sum of six sevens, i.e. SUMMATION of identical numbers, but where is multiplication as an action?

In reality, 6x7 means 6x6x6x6x6x6x6=67; 7×7×7×7×7×7×7=76, 67>76 read the definition of product, Product is the result of multiplying n factors A×A×A…×A =P and degree “Degree, the product of several equal factors (for example 24 = 2×2×2×2=16) ., the number 2 when presented in a product is called a multiplicand, and when presented in the notation form the degree is called the base of the degree, the number 4 when presented in a product is called a multiplier, and when presented in the notation form the degree is called the exponent.

It is worth recalling some properties of the SUM: 1. the number of units (terms) on the left side of the equality is always equal to the number of units on the right side of the equality.

2. Changing the places of the terms does not change the sum of the terms. When defining a mathematical operation, you should pay attention to the properties of the sum, which are necessarily present as a fact.

Thus, it is OBVIOUS that in elementary mathematics, many problems have been introduced by redefining words and functions, leading to a distortion of consciousness and the introduction of contradictions and errors into the norm of life.

The article Generic volumetric knowledge of RUSs presents examples of tables of MULTIPLICATION (PROSSITION TO POWER) and SUMMATION, as well as counting rules, where counting starts from zero, and tables show summation and multiplication with actions starting from one. Ancient RUS counting: selecting and decreasing one in binary counting - zero-0, whole-1, half-1/2, quarter-1/4, oct-1/8, pudovichok-1/16, copper-1/32, silver-1/64, spool-1/128; etc. – selection and increase of unit: zero-0, whole-1, pair-2, two pairs-4, four pairs-8, eight pairs-16, sixteen par-32, thirty-two par-64, sixty-four par-128, one hundred and twenty-eight par-256, two hundred and fifty-six par-512, five hundred and twelve par-1024.

Computer memory - bits, 2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256,512,1024 kilobytes

TAB. MULTIPLICATIONS RUS TABLE. SUMMATION RUS

P = Multiplicand× Multiplier, Σ = Addend + Addend DEGREE = BASIC. DEGREES×INDEX

1x0=10=1	1+0=1
1x1=11=1	1+1=2
1x2=12=1x1=1	1+2=1+1+1=3
1x3=13=1x1x1=1	1+3=1+1+1+1=4
1x4=14=1x1x1x1=1	1+4=1+1+1+1+1=5
1x5=15=1x1x1x1x1=1	1+5=1+1+1+1+1+1=6
1x6=16=1x1x1x1x1x1=1	1+6=1+1+1+1+1+1+1=7
1x7=17=1x1x1x1x1x1x1=1	1+7=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=8
1x8=18=1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1=1	1+8=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=9
1x9=19=1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1=1	1+9=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=10
1x10=110=1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1x1=1	1+10=1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1=11
2x0=20=1 (2x3=23=8 is not equal to 3x2=32=9)	2+0=2 (2+3=3+2=5)
2x1=21=2	2+1=3
2x2=22=2x2=4	2+2=4
2x3=23=2x2x2=8	2+2+2=6
2x4=24=2x2x2x2=16	2+2+2+2=8
2x5=25=2x2x2x2x2=32	2+2+2+2+2=10
2x6=26=2x2x2x2x2x2=64	2+2+2+2+2+2=12
2x7=27=2x2x2x2x2x2x2=128	2+2+2+2+2+2+2=14
2x8=28=2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2=256	2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2=16
2x9=29=2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2=512	2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2=18
2x10=210=2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2x2=1024	2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2+2=20

From the tables it is OBVIOUS to the naked eye that the results of multiplication and

summations are significantly different, and when appropriately checked for logical and mathematical compatibility with the definitions, SUM-SUMMATION, with the signs “+” “-”, and PRODUCT-MULTIPLICATION-POWER with the sign “×”, taking into account the basic properties (features) are not raise doubts about the correctness of mathematical operations and results. In SES, the three definitions of mathematical operations are not in doubt, since there are no contradictions there, but in the definition

MULTIPLICATION introduces an obvious contradiction. Multiplication, arithmetic operation. Indicated by a dot or the sign “×” (in alphabetical calculations), the U signs are omitted. U. positive integers

(natural numbers) is an action that allows, given two numbers,

a (to the multiplicand) and b (to the multiplier) find the third number ab (product) equal to the sum of the b terms ? Miracles! each of which is equal to a.

A problematic issue in mathematics is “the number (digit) 0 (zero), which by definition is translated from the Latin nullus - none, the number 0 does not change when added (or subtracted) to any number: A+0=0+A=A ; the product of any number and zero = zero, A×0=0×A. Division by zero is impossible...” Based on the materials of the article Generic volumetric knowledge of RUSs, the value of the number 0 (zero) was and is given primary importance, defining the unit (1), the beginning of counting objects and the transition to a new unit When considering the MULTIPLICATION table 1 × 0 = 10 = 1 and 2 × 0 = 20=1, for example, five eggs multiplied by zero = one heel of eggs, we get a new unit (1), in numbers: it will be (5th) × 0=(5th)0= new unit (1) one heel of eggs.

The question of the action “division” in mathematics is quite serious, if we assume that the action “division” is the opposite of the action of multiplication, then the ends do not meet, for example 2×2×2=8 there is no doubt, then how does it happen when dividing a number 8 by 3 we get 2.6..., i.e. we have “division” with a remainder, and therefore either the action is not “division”, or we are dividing incorrectly, or the statement that “division” is the inverse of multiplication is not true. The answer can only be obtained by checking, i.e. divide 8:3 - with a corner, as they teach in school. It is obvious that in the “corner” the number (digit) 3 is summed up, and under the “corner” the number (digit) 6 and the number (digits) 18 are subtracted, respectively, from the number (digits) 8 and the number (digits) 20. This action is missing the “division” sign “:”, and therefore the “division” action itself. Let's check the multiplication action for compliance of the result, definitions and characteristics according to the rules of ancient RUS, for example: 5×5=55=5×5×5×5×5=

5× (1+1+1+1+1) × 5×5×5=(5+5+5+5+5) ×5×5×5=(25) × 5×5×5=

25× (1+1+1+1+1) × 5×5=(25+25+25+25+25) ×5×5=

(125)×5×5=

125× (1+1+1+1+1)=(125+125+125+125+125)=625×5.=625(1+1+1+1+1)=

(625+625+625+625+625)=3125. It is obvious that all fundamental mathematical operations in this example are performed in accordance with definitions, basic features (properties) and mandatory compliance with mathematical and logical foundations without contradictions.

To remove contradictions in the definition of the action of multiplication, a logical and natural justification for the mathematical definition of the action of multiplication according to the rules of RUS is necessary. Example: 1. let’s sum three seeds 1s+1s+1s=3s “take and add (store, capitalize)” into a box where they will be stored for 1 year, the result both before adding the three seeds is 3s, and after a year 3s. 2. Let’s sum up the three seeds 1c+1c+1c, after which we plant them in the ground and water them, the sun will warm them up and nature will begin to produce: first roots, then leaves, flowers, and at the last stage seeds.

Having collected the harvest and counted the seeds, we are pleased to note that nature produced a lot of seeds, from the point of view of mathematical interpretation, we multiplied the seeds, and according to the knowledge of the RUSSIANS, we LIVED SMARTLY. It is obvious that the substitution (redefinition) of the ancient RUSSIAN action

LIVE SMARTLY, with an emphasis on the first letter U. “mathematicians” tried to redefine successively into multiply with an emphasis on the letter O, and then into ADD, with an emphasis on the letter O; examples come from above.

After the logical and mathematical proofs of the actions product and summation are given in full, the problem of writing mathematical actions that exclude contradictions from the beginning remains, and this issue is being resolved. First, let’s remember the symbols for the sum “Σ” and the product “P”, and then we use the algebraic alphanumeric combination in full: 2Σ3=2+2+2=6; in words – adding a two three times equals six! 2П3=2×2×2=8; in words - to produce two (multiply) three times equals eight. In this way, all contradictions and problems in the foundation are removed primary education, mathematics.

An indicative example, as a consequence of mathematical and other redefinitions and substitution of meaning, is obvious in the Periodic Table (PS) of D.I. Mendeleev. In 1905-1906 DI. Mendeleev introduced ZERO PERIOD and ZERO SERIES into his PS and placed the chemical element under the symbol “X” in the zero series of the zero period and the chemical element “Y” in the zero series of the first period. After the death of D.I. they were removed by someone from the PS, the zero period was excluded by someone, and the zero row was rearranged by someone into the eighth, without the “Y” element. In PS Rusov, the electroatom Vserod (electrochemical element, “X” according to Mendeleev) is in the zero row of the zero period, and the total electroatom inert HYDROGEN N RUS 2 (electrochemical element, “Y” according to Mendeleev) is in the zero row of the first period. When distributing (arrangement) of electroatoms according to the volumetric electrical density of the RUSs, the PS is described in the binary counting of the RUSs, i.e. PS is calculated in a self-organized manner! From school we were taught that it is impossible to build a model of an atom without gaps from three balls, and therefore it was necessary to come up with the necessary, some kind of medium that fills the voids between the atoms, which was called ETHER. It turned out that with sufficient three-dimensional vision or the ability to design objects in volume, it is possible to build - Fig.3. It turned out that the task of building a model of an atom without gaps was solved long ago by the ancestors of the RUSs and was “lost” by someone, and any attempts to restore the ancient design of electroatoms and PS are met with stone walls from all interested parties from science, education, journal editors, and most scientists , who were brought up and trained in Western terms and theories, which were, are, and will be propagated in abundance by Western scientists and their untenable theories through power structures.

PERIODIC SYSTEM according to which we are taught,

as if PS D.I. MENDELEEV

Fig 1

When considering Fig. 2 PS D.I. Mendeleev discovers that the chemical element Hydrogen “H” is only third in order, and this deals a blow to Nobel laureates with their theories and “discoveries”. In 1912 E. Rutherford was the first to use the term “core” and that is why we were taught to call it the Rutherford-Bohr planetary model. However, for the first time in 1901, the French scientist Jean Perrin, and not Rutherford, in the article “Molecular Hypotheses” expressed his hypothesis “a positively charged nucleus is surrounded by negative electrons that move in certain orbits” - this is exactly how the structure of an atom in any modern textbook". However, these models of atoms and PS did not lend themselves to physical and mathematical calculations and the models were archived, except for the supposedly Rutherford model, and the name of Rutherford, as if the developer, remained. But the most interesting thing is that the conventions “+” and “-” were introduced by B. Franklin in 1798-1800. in the study of friction processes, leading physics to a dead end solid and electricity, and in 1897 J. Thomson and, as if independently from him, Emil Wichert never discovered a negative charge - the electron, since there is nothing negative in nature, and when studying X-rays, J. Thomson simply suggested, and together they seemed to simultaneously “clearly establish that the mass of a negatively charged electron is 1/1837 of the mass of a hydrogen atom.”

PERIODIC SYSTEM D.I. Mendeleev1905-1906

Fig.2

When checking the correctness of the distribution chemical elements in the second period of the Periodic Table by atomic weight in Ne, Li, Be, B, C, N, O, F, - it turns out that the atomic weight of the metals Li, Be under normal conditions is less than that of the gases N, O, F, which contradicts experiments and common sense.

There are 255 electroatoms in the RUS PS, eight of which have an electrical structure that is different from the rest of the electroatoms and therefore they are called inert (the most stable in the period).

In an isoteric sense, the PS of the RUSs shows that the seemingly lost knowledge of antiquity is the Volumetric knowledge of the RUSs.

Nuclear-free model in the form of a Russian doll made of eights “THREE All-Kinds in ONE”.

The main module SHAR-POWER is a single electroatom VSEROD Vs. - “X”.

Binary module RUS 2 – aggregate electroatom inert HYDROGEN H - “Y”

Symbols of the main Religions: YIN-YANG, CRESCENT, GAZERBOARD, UMBRELLA, BALL are included as components in the periodic system of RUS and show the unity of all the main earthly Religions. When projecting the main symbols of Religions onto a plane, all of them are components of the nuclear-free model of the total ELECTROATOM - inert HYDROGEN H (RUS-2), “Y” according to Mendeleev.

This method of constructing electrical structures of electroatoms combined physics, chemistry, electricity, electrical matter, counting RUS (mathematics) into a single system of Knowledge, without contradictions, and removed the problem of the Unified Field Theory.

PERIODIC SYSTEM OF ELECTROATOMS RUS

Fig 3

Periodic table RUSvolumetric version in section.

Rybnikov Yuri Stepanovich

Science
Date of Birth
Citizenship	Russia
Website
FreakRank

Rybnikov Yuri Stepanovich- a freak who specializes in physics and is quite popular among the narrow-minded category of Internet users. Famous for his invention periodic table electroatoms RUS, a method for constructing electrical structures of electroatoms, combining physics, chemistry, electricity, counting RUS (mathematics) into a unified system of Knowledge.

Completely denies modern theory atomic structure and many other modern scientific ideas. In general, his work is a typical meaningless pile of incorrectly given scientific terms.

RUS is an abbreviation for Equal Sustainable Symmetry (system) of earthlings who lived and are living in free clans in accordance with nature. RUSs created, are creating and will create an original, self-sufficient, self-sufficient, self-protected association of the people - RUSs. The original way of life of tribal associations allows the RUS to create continuity of Knowledge from mouth to mouth. Knowledge remained in the tribal consciousness of each relative and was passed on from generation to generation. The knowledge of nature by the Russians was carried out using non-destructive methods, which allowed the Parents to prepare Creators, excluding any destructive principle in the form of creators, conquerors, and conquerors of nature. Life is given to a person by his PARENTS, to live in harmony with NATURE, passing on the experience of his ancestors SAVE NATURE to each subsequent generation in the Family of Creators. What is the extensive knowledge of the RUS? Let us turn to the works of D.I. Mendeleev, in the article “An attempt at a chemical understanding of the world ether,” according to Democritus, who wrote about 400 BC, “spirit, like fire, consists of small, round, smooth, most mobile, easily penetrating atoms, the movement of which constitutes the phenomenon of life " It's obvious that we're talking about about balls (spheres), which are absolute symmetry in nature. The ball (sphere) is an obvious infinity, in which there is neither beginning nor end. The structure of balls (infinities) constitutes the system of the Infinite Universe, the distribution of infinities in nature creates a system of Atoms (balls, spheres), which is perverted by science with the help of Geniots (Bohr, Rutherfor, Thomson) the lie is presented to us today as a planetary model of the atom with fictitious “electrons” with a charge “-” and protons with a charge “+”. At one time, “-” and “+” were invented by B. Franklin in 1798-1803. A ball (sphere) manifests itself in nature as electrically neutral (fields, charges, particles, waves, sounds, magnets, light, electroatoms, frequencies, radiation, electrical matter), etc.) depending on specific conditions, specific structures, properties, environments , in any state of aggregation.

He has a neon inside, an analyzer and a thinker... (The Strugatskys. The Tale of the Troika)

I immediately recognized this old man - he had been to our institute several times, and he had also been to many other institutes, and once I saw him in the reception room of the Deputy Minister of Heavy Engineering, where he was sitting first in line, patient, clean, blazing with enthusiasm. He was a good old man, harmless, but, unfortunately, he could not imagine himself outside of scientific and technical creativity.
I took the heavy case from him and placed the invention on the demonstration table. The old man, finally freed, bowed and said in a rattling voice:
- My regards. Mashkin Edelweiss Zakharovich, inventor.
“Not him,” Khlebovvodov said in a low voice. - He’s not and doesn’t look like him. Presumably, a completely different Babkin. Namesake, presumably.
“Yes, yes,” the old man agreed, smiling. “He brought it here for the public to judge.” Professor, comrade Vybegallo, God bless him, recommended it. I’m ready to demonstrate if that’s your desire, otherwise I’ve been staying indecently in your Colony...
Lavr Fedotovich, who was looking at him carefully, put down his binoculars and slowly bowed his head. The old man began to fuss. He removed the cover from the case, under which was a bulky antique typewriter, took a coil of wire from his pocket, stuck one end somewhere in the bowels of the machine, then looked around for an outlet and, having found it, unwound the wire and stuck in the plug.
“Here, if you please, is the so-called heuristic machine,” said the old man. – An accurate electronic-mechanical device for answering any questions, namely scientific and economic ones. How does it work for me? Not having enough funds and being kicked around by various bureaucrats, I have not yet fully automated it. The questions are asked orally, and I type them out and thus bring them inside her, bringing them, so to speak, to her attention. Her answer, again through incomplete automation, I type again. Sort of a middleman, hehe! So, if you like, please.
He stood behind the typewriter and flipped the toggle switch with a smart gesture. A neon light came on in the depths of the car.
“Please,” repeated the old man.
-What kind of lamp do you have there? – Farfurkis asked suspiciously.
The old man struck the keys, then quickly tore a piece of paper out of the typewriter and trotted it to Farfurkis. Farfurkis read aloud:
- “Question: what does she have... um... does she have inside for her personal injury?” Lepeche...Kepade, perhaps? What kind of lepeche is this?
“It’s a light bulb,” said the old man, giggling and rubbing his hands. - Let's code little by little. “He snatched the piece of paper from Farfurkis and ran back to his typewriter. “So that was the question,” he said, pushing the piece of paper under the roller. – Now let’s see what she will answer...
The Troika members watched his actions with interest. Professor Vybegallo beamed with a benign, fatherly quality, picking out some debris from his beard with refined and smooth movements of his fingers. Edik was in a calm, now fully conscious melancholy. Meanwhile, the old man cheerfully tapped the keys and pulled out the piece of paper again.
- Here, if you please, is the answer.
Farfurkis read:
- “I have... um... not... neon inside me.” Hm. What is neon?
- Ain seconds! – the inventor exclaimed, grabbed the piece of paper and ran to the typewriter again.
Things got going. The machine gave an incompetent explanation of what a neon was, then it answered Farfurkis that it was written “inside” according to the rules of grammar, and then...
F a r f u r k i s: What kind of grammar?
M ashina: And our Russian engine.
Khlebovvodov: Do you know Eduard Petrovich Babkin?
M ashina: Not at all.
Lavr Fedotovich: Grrrm... What proposals will there be?
M ashina: Recognize me as a scientific fact.
The old man ran and typed with incredible speed. The commandant was jumping up and down in his chair enthusiastically and giving me the thumbs up. Vitka, lounging around, giggling as if in a circus.
Khlebovvodov (irritated): I can’t work like that. Why is he flailing back and forth like a tinplate in the wind?
M ashina: Due to aspiration.
Khlebovvodov: Take your piece of paper away from me! I'm not asking you anything, can you understand that?
M ashina: Yes, yes, I can.

He has a neon inside, an analyzer and a thinker... (The Strugatskys. The Tale of the Troika)

Wednesday, 09 Oct. 2013

Everything ingenious is simple and interconnected. How are we deliberately led away from imaginative thinking? Scientist, inventor Yu.S. Rybnikov claims that at school we memorized (crammed) the multiplication table without checking its correctness, we were taught from the cradle to live by “faith” and this is what it led to. Using examples from physics, chemistry, and mathematics, Yu. S. Rybnikov shows and explains why modern science doesn't see such obvious mistakes... Everyone watch!

Why do we today count not from zero, but from one, and why does the multiplication table generally start from two?

How are we multiply to zero if we don’t start counting from zero?

Why multiplication to zero it gives zero, but maybe it’s not true?

Why multiplication And exponentiation a-priory the same action, and they teach us at school what it is different?

Sum- this is a completely separate action, but we are told that there is no amount, there is addition. A addition this is already multiplication.

How are we deceived at school?

How we are taught multiply 2×3=6, or 2×3=2+2+2=6, although logically and according to the rules of mathematics it was necessary to write 2×3=2×2×2=8.

If we assume that the action " division» reverse action multiplication, then the ends do not meet, for example 2×2×2=8 there is no doubt, then how with division numbers 8 by 3 we get 2.6..., i.e. we have " division"with a remainder, and therefore or the action is not " division", or we divide incorrectly, or the statement that "division" is the inverse of multiplication does not correspond to reality...

Revolution in science according to Yu.S. Rybnikov. Discussions of Yu.S. Rybnikov’s theory with scientists and simply with young people and enthusiasts.

Scientific researcher, Rybnikov Yu.S. invented, developed and introduced polymer powder painting technology in the USSR, teaches at the Moscow State Technical University of Radio Engineering of Electronics and Automation (MSTU MIREA), Moscow, Russia.

Duration: 05:03:51

Additional Information: Zombification is a forced processing of a person’s subconscious, thanks to which he is programmed to unconditionally obey the orders of his master. Zombification itself begins with kindergarten and continues throughout your life.

Practical methods of zombification: a lot of information is drummed into our heads.

How does this happen?